Just researching, and I came across the TV channel on JW.org.
Is it only for the anglophone public? No subtitle when the GB member speaks? Or, am I missing to change a setting?
bats in the belfry
JoinedPosts by bats in the belfry
-
5
JW Broadcasting - English language ONLY ?
by bats in the belfry injust researching, and i came across the tv channel on jw.org.. .
is it only for the anglophone public?
no subtitle when the gb member speaks?
-
-
-
32
Series of articles about the March 15, 2015 Watchtower on AD1914.com
by Gilgamesh inover the next 5 weeks, we should have 5 or 6 articles/posts that will provide more commentary on the march 15, 2015 watchtower.
important doctrinal changes in march 15th, 2015 watchtower (study edition) explained wp.me/p4cpzs-xo .
http://ad1914.com/2014/04/20/new-important-doctrinal-changes-in-march-15th-watchtower-study-edition-explained-clarified/.
-
-
bats in the belfry
"Type and Anti-Type" - F.W. Franz will be impressed.
N.B.: He is not the one dispensing 'truths' from heaven now, or is he?
-
12
When elders became the disfellowshippers instead of the entire congregation.
by tim hooper ini'm trying to find the wt instructions for this procedure.
extensive googling brings up watchtower 1944 may 15 p.151 as the reference.
anyone able to look up the reference?
-
-
-
5
Anyone have a scan of WT Feb 1938 Edition with a Title "Should they Marry"?
by Matt_fs incan't seem to find online, wondering if anyone has access to it?.
.
thank you in advance.
-
-
bats in the belfry
You can download the entire pdf WT 1938 volume here:
https://ia600304.us.archive.org/27/items/WatchtowerLibrary/magazines/w/w1938_E.pdf
.
or use this:
.
.
-
65
October 1914? Really?
by sylvlef inkm august 2014, page 3 paragraph 6(article for this week's service meeting):.
"the month of october 2014 will see the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the kingdom.
for this occasion a special edition of the watchtower will be on this theme.".
-
-
bats in the belfry
jwfacts >>> It would be interesting to know when it moved back to Oct.
.
The earliest indication of moving the date of the 'gentile times' ending back to October 1914 I could reference to the WT issue of October 15, 1945, page 308, par 8.
The next one followed in the WT issue of November 1, 1949, page 331, par. 24.
-
65
October 1914? Really?
by sylvlef inkm august 2014, page 3 paragraph 6(article for this week's service meeting):.
"the month of october 2014 will see the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the kingdom.
for this occasion a special edition of the watchtower will be on this theme.".
-
-
bats in the belfry
.
Oubliette >>> October 2, 1914 . . . or, was it?
..
Just guessing, but Rutherford must have dealt with Russell's diary in a folklorish way.
JFR insisted on the date of August 1914. And, btw, the WT May 1, 1922 issue reads "on the first day of October 1914", whereas the "Revelation - Its Grand Climax At Hand" book reads October 2, 1914. Go, figure!.
.
-
65
October 1914? Really?
by sylvlef inkm august 2014, page 3 paragraph 6(article for this week's service meeting):.
"the month of october 2014 will see the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the kingdom.
for this occasion a special edition of the watchtower will be on this theme.".
-
-
bats in the belfry
.
jwfacts >>> 2nd Oct 1914 has always been the end of the Gentile times.
.
.
Until the mid 1920s it was more like a dual approach.
.
.
Watchtower - December 1, 1919
.
.
Watchtower - January 1, 1923
.
.
Booklet: "A Desirable Goverment", 1924
.
-
31
stupid statement in watchtower about appointments of elders
by hoser inafter going through all the processes of how they appointed elders in the past they say this:.
"the elders in turn would inform the newly appointed men of their appointment, asking them if they were willing and actually qualified to accept the assignment.
so after qualifying the man you ask him if he is qualified.. .
-
-
bats in the belfry
.
Who knows of the shortest time between appointment and deletion of an elder?
In my memory of ample happenings I recall in one case a 16 day period in between those two events.
-
31
stupid statement in watchtower about appointments of elders
by hoser inafter going through all the processes of how they appointed elders in the past they say this:.
"the elders in turn would inform the newly appointed men of their appointment, asking them if they were willing and actually qualified to accept the assignment.
so after qualifying the man you ask him if he is qualified.. .
-
-
bats in the belfry
As was always suspected, Holy Spirit got nothing to do with appointments.
.
.
9. Deletions during a regular visit to a congregation:
Recommendations for deletion because of poor judgment not of a judicial nature are usually best considered with the elders during the visit of the circuit overseer.
.vv
BOE 2014-07-13 - Appointment and deletion of elders and ministerial servants
.
-
7
I can not find the recording of Fred Franz talk at Bethel about Governing Body being unscritual
by Greybeard ini thought it was on youtube.
did them big cowboys at the top remove it?.
-
-
bats in the belfry
.
Alluding to Franz's eisegesis the Watchtower publication put this in print:
.
Addressing the graduates, F. W. Franz showed why they were not being sent by any ecclesiastical body such as exists in the churches of Christendom. According to the Scriptures, neither Philip nor the apostle Paul, two outstanding evangelizers or missionaries in the first century C.E., received missionary assignments from the apostolic body at Jerusalem. Both men did their work under the direction of the real head of the Christian congregation, Jesus Christ. Paul had, in fact, been directly chosen by Jesus as an apostle to the nations. Later, at the direction of God’s spirit, Paul and his companion Barnabas were sent out from the Antioch congregation. Both men recognized their assignment as having come, not from men, but from Jesus Christ. The missionaries trained at Gilead School can also be confident of Christ’s backing and direction.
w75 11/1 p. 672 - Graduates of Gilead’s 59th Class Urged to Stick to the Work
.
